Financial services come last in latest global barometer

0
408

Edelman Intelligence reports that trust in the financial services industry is stalling after five years of steadily increasing trust after the global financial crisis. The Edelman Trust Barometer, which measures trust in business, NGOs, government and the media on an annual basis, shows that financial services achieved only a two-point increase over 2017.

The Barometer tracks the views of both the general population and the ‘informed public’, which consists of university-educated people between 25 and 64, who are in the top 25% of household income per age group in each market.

“Particularly concerning this year is the widening gap in trust between the general population and the ‘informed public’,” says Richard Rattue, Managing Director of Compli-Serve SA. “This is a parlous state of affairs given the urgent need to make financial services accessible to lower- and middle-income individuals, especially in this country.”

Ongoing scandals don’t help. South Africa is still reeling from the Steinhoff debacle, which saw local investors, including those saving for retirement in pension and provident funds, lose millions of rands. In addition, the VBS scandal caught everyone’s attention last year.

Another fact that stands out in the 2019 report is that in the United States, the largest economy in the world, trust in financial services crashed by 23 points among the informed public. Traditionally, the informed public has had more trust in the sector than the general population.

Where are financial services companies falling short? 

The top 5 factors that decrease trust are:

  1. 1.No product and/or cost transparency
  2. 2.Confusing products and services
  3. 3.Unwanted selling
  4. 4.Not responsive
  5. 5.Difficulty addressing problems.

 

The top five factors that increase trust are:

  1. 1.Easily understood terms and conditions
  2. 2.Reliable fraud protection
  3. 3.Easily found product and service information
  4. 4.Business convenience
  5. 5.Access to real people

With regard to technology vs. the human touch, respondents wanted both. When asked to rate what is important when choosing a financial services company, 81% of respondents rated “they make it easy to work with real people” highly while 79% rated highly “they use the latest technology”.

“This is not surprising,” Rattue says, “and shows once again that it’s rash to throw the baby out with the bath water.  Financial products and services are simply too complex to leave it all up to technology.”

The report further shows that human interaction was most highly coveted when getting investment advice, settling a disputed charge on a credit card, and selecting and purchasing investment products.  

Human interaction was least required when selecting and purchasing an insurance policy, depositing money into an account, and applying for a credit card.

When asked “which source do you trust the most for financial advice?” first place went to a credentialed investment adviser, followed by friends and family, then information on websites and newsletters and finally by employees of the financial services companies respondents used. “Given the much-purported rise of ‘robo-advice’ the first point is interesting, and is good news for our local IFAs,” Rattue concludes.